Is Keir Starmer’s silence on Venezuela a mistake? What history tells us

By Martin Farr, Senior Lecturer in Contemporary British History, Newcastle University

It is unlikely that within the first few days of a great global event – one moreover triggered by its closest ally launching a coup and kidnapping a head of state – a British government has said so little. It took 16 hours for it to say anything at all, and then, not much. And it has said not much thereafter.

So little said, at such length: the prime minister, in his Sunday morning BBC TV interview; James Kariuki, chargé d’affaires in the UK Mission to the United Nations at Monday morning’s Security Council emergency session; and Yvette Cooper, foreign secretary,

Read complete article

~	Kate Mildenhall’s fast-paced thriller The Hiding Place skewers middle-class pretensions

~	Why grieving a pet can be as hard as grieving a person

~	Canada risks missing out on Africa’s trade boom under Mark Carney

~	US boards a ship sailing under a Russian flag: what we know and don’t know about the legal position

~	Stephen Miller: portrait of Donald Trump’s ideologue-in-chief

~	Cuba’s leaders just lost an ally in Maduro − if starved of Venezuelan oil, they may also lose what remains of their public support

~	Canada has too few professional archeologists, and that has economic consequences

~	Risks young chimps take as they swing through the trees underscore role of protective parenting in humans

~	The Neurotechnology Shift: how next-generation wearables interface with the brain itself

~	Surprising number of foods contain microplastics. Here’s how to reduce the amount you consume