Meta-backed research finds exposure to ‘untrustworthy’ social media is rare. The fine print is less reassuring

By Marian-Andrei Rizoiu, Associate Professor in Behavioral Data Science, University of Technology Sydney

How much of what you see on social media comes from sources that repeatedly post falsehoods? And if that content quietly vanished from your feed, would you believe anything different months later?

A new study published today in Science Advances offers the most rigorous answers yet. It comes from a collaboration between Meta and academic researchers who studied the 2020 United States election. It was run from inside the machine – on the live feeds of Facebook and Instagram.

The answers sound reassuring:…

Read complete article

~	Mali: Evidence of war crimes by armed groups in Gao region

~	What really happens to your data when you click ‘delete’?

~	The EU has fined Google a billion dollars for ignoring competition rules – but will it have any effect?

~	Gironde wildfires: what the logistical challenges behind the mass evacuations tell us

~	Why Spain needs to invest heavily in preventing fires, not just in fighting them

~	Running from Russia, running from hate: A trans girl’s flight to survival

~	Leaning into Uncle Vanya’s bleakness: a sumptuous play, with a deeply modern feel

~	After a record-breaking night at the Commonwealth Games, Australia is primed to produce more world-class athletes

~	‘The fire has such power’: why the wildfires gripping France and Spain are off the charts

~	A lifelike robot called ‘Sally’ was going to teach in a US school. It’s not a weird as it sounds