Why Colorado replaced its AI discrimination law with a transparency requirement that the feds might challenge anyway

By Stefani Langehennig, Assistant Professor of Practice, Daniels College of Business, University of Denver

When Colorado replaced its landmark AI law in May 2026, the move looked like a retreat from ambitious lawmaking. The state abandoned a first-of-its-kind framework that required companies to actively prevent algorithmic discrimination. That’s the risk that automated systems produce biased outcomes based on race, gender, age or other protected characteristics when making…

Read complete article

~	Sri Lanka: Deaths of transferred Negombo prisoners following clashes must be urgently investigated

~	How an outage like Telstra’s affects Australians’ health care, beyond emergency calls

~	Neil the seal is more than a viral animal. He’s become a global folk hero

~	Angus Taylor warns a One Nation government would bring ‘an eternity of pain’

~	After the ‘red card’ scandal, has the shine come off Gianni Infantino’s World Cup?

~	Grattan on Friday: AI’s opportunities and risks front and centre on Albanese government’s agenda

~	STING protein: our study found new ways for the body to activate – and possibly control – inflammation

~	Global: Filipino domestic workers exploited and subjected to sexual abuse in Saudi Arabia

~	Statelessness in the region of former Yugoslavia: unfinished nationality rights, legal identity and Roma exclusion

~	A timing glitch was behind Telstra’s nationwide outage. It points to a bigger vulnerability