People are using AI to communicate without disclosing it. Is this morally wrong?

By Siavosh Sahebi, PhD Candidate in Philosophy, Macquarie University
Thomas Montefiore, Postdoctoral Research Associate in Philosophy, Macquarie University

Imagine you have used a generative artificial intelligence (AI) tool such as ChatGPT to tidy up notes you took while in a meeting. Your colleague comments on how clear they are. You don’t disclose it was the AI that made the notes clear and not you.

Now consider a different scenario. You are at your mother’s funeral. Her best friend of many years delivers a heartfelt eulogy, wishing her well in the afterlife. But later you discover her friend did not actually write the eulogy in any way – AI did.

The undisclosed use of generative AI in these two scenarios is deceptive.…

Read complete article

~	What is ‘strategic autonomy’ – and why is everyone suddenly reaching for it?

~	Bison restoration efforts and grazing rights hinge on one question: Are bison wildlife?

~	Tony Carruthers recently survived a lethal injection attempt – the latest man to endure a failed execution

~	For Black women in abusive relationships, gun-control loopholes can engender deadly disparities

~	James Comey’s Instagram seashell post sits in a murky legal zone between protected political speech and criminal threat

~	US territories have a voice in Congress but no vote – here’s why

~	Irregular heartbeat risk much lower in super-fit people than previously thought

~	Reaction to Henry Nowak murder shows why the government needs to channel a real ‘common sense’

~	Dopamine menus: can small pleasures help us get unstuck?

~	Who can carry a kirpan in the UK? Religion, law and the question of risk