Mandelson vetting: Starmer’s reluctance to engage with the details shows a lack of political leadership

By Stefan Stern, Visiting Professor of Management Practice, Bayes Business School, City St George's, University of London

For all of Keir Starmer’s undoubted abilities, steady nerve and top-level experience in the legal profession, his tenure as prime minister has been fraught with difficulty. This is no doubt partly due to his limited enthusiasm for the (at times banal) realities of political leadership.

It is also due to his reluctance to engage sufficiently with the details of important decisions. At key moments, he has chosen to look the other way and defer to others to execute.

The most recent and consequential example of this is the appointment of Peter Mandelson as ambassador to Washington…

Read complete article

~	Ban on phones in schools: support for headteachers or unnecessary legislation?

~	The Duolingo taxi test – could being rude to the driver cost you your dream job?

~	Turner prize 2026 shortlist points to sculpture as a way of thinking about power, ecology and belief

~	Euphoria: thoughtless depictions of adults pretending to be sexualised infants are extremely harmful

~	Joan Eardley: ‘she would set up her canvas on the shore and paint in the lashing wind and rain like a woman possessed’

~	What Mandelson vetting row reveals about escalating tensions between ministers and civil servants

~	Why some countries give away free electricity and even pay consumers to use it

~	Supplements for menopause: here’s what the evidence actually says

~	How Israel’s history has shaped the way it wages war

~	Has the Strait of Hormuz emerged as Iran’s most powerful form of deterrence?