Here’s what the review of the IVF industry said should change – and what it missed

By Karin Hammarberg, Adjunct Senior Research Fellow, Global and Women's Health, School of Public Health & Preventive Medicine, Monash University
Alex Polyakov, Medical Director, Genea Fertility Melbourne; Clinical Associate Professor, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry & Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne
Catherine Mills, Professor of Bioethics, Monash University
Karinne Ludlow, Associate Professor in Biotechnology Law, Monash University

The review recommended an independent accreditation body as a priority. But there are notable gaps, including no mention of a national donor register.

Read complete article

~	From the Andes to the Amazon: Investigating China's climate impact in Latin America

~	Taylor Swift’s Father Figure isn’t a cover, but an ‘interpolation’. What that means – and why it matters

~	Thomas Pynchon’s Vineland, set in 1984, is translated for the Trump era in One Battle After Another

~	‘Toothpick grooves’ in ancient fossil human teeth may not be from toothpicks after all

~	How do banks assess you for a home loan? And how do you work out what you can afford?

~	Who wrote the cabinet paper recommending NZ not recognise a Palestinian state?

~	Australia’s new food security strategy: what’s on the table, and what’s missing?

~	US economy is already on the edge – a prolonged government shutdown could send it tumbling over

~	Justice for Palestinians Can’t Wait for a Peace Deal

~	Chad’s Weaponization of Citizenship