Election 2024: why it’s still worth watching the multi-party debate

By Jen Birks, Associate Professor in Media and Political Communication, University of Nottingham

The fallout from the first general election debate has left viewers and voters with a bad taste in their mouths. The Conservatives’ disputed claim about Labour’s tax plans shows precisely the problems of adversarial debate formats: they favour soundbites, attack politics and rhetorical tactics that can be misleading.

Much of the debate involved Rishi Sunak and Keir Starmer shouting over one another (and moderator Julie Etchingham shouting over both). This may explain…

Read complete article

~	Cambodia: Scamming crisis survivors must be protected amid police crackdown

~	How the ‘big, beautiful bill’ will deepen the racial wealth gap – a law scholar explains how it reduces poor families’ ability to afford food and health care

~	‘People who spent years saving lives are now struggling to survive’ – how we witnessed Trump’s USAID cuts devastate health programmes in Kenya

~	Cynthia Erivo will be the most talked about Jesus of 2025 – but women have long retold the gospel

~	A brief art history of adultery

~	It doesn’t have to be welfare versus warfare. Changes that make tax fairer could fund both

~	Exercise could ease symptoms for people with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) – new study

~	Testosterone gel: what happens if it rubs off on other people

~	Cognitive warfare: why wars without bombs or bullets are a legal blind spot

~	Decoding hints that Xi Jinping may be under pressure to relinquish some of his power