Supreme Court has not committed to a major innovation in transparency it started during the pandemic

By Eve Ringsmuth, Associate Professor of Political Science, Oklahoma State University
Rachael Houston, Assistant Professor of American judicial politics, Texas Christian University
Timothy Johnson, Horace T. Morse Distinguished Professor of Political Science and Law, University of Minnesota

The Supreme Court has not yet committed to making livestreaming oral arguments a permanent part of its work. But this measure could lead to more transparency and possibly confidence in the court.

Read complete article

~	Poop tests and blood tests join colonoscopy as options for colorectal cancer screening

~	Who is talking about artificial intelligence in Ecuador?

~	When ICE ramped up enforcement, US-born workers didn’t see any economic gains

~	Chinese American teens experience depression, anxiety at higher rates than peers – here’s why their parents may miss the warning signs

~	I’ve been studying racist costume parties for a decade, and colleges are failing at educating the students about why they’re wrong

~	Scientists used a method from ecology to identify whether icy moons could hold conditions for life

~	PFAS leave fingerprints in your blood – researchers are figuring out how forever chemicals transform in your body to read these clues

~	Far removed from today’s global juggernaut, soccer was born in the well-heeled boarding schools of 19th-century England

~	Better patient-nurse relationships can transform mental health care – and make hospital stays shorter

~	Why Africa – and the world – remain dangerously unprepared for the next pandemic