Why government budgets are exercises in distributing life and death as much as fiscal calculations

By Hazem Zohny, Research Fellow in Practical Ethics, University of Oxford

Sacrificial dilemmas are popular among philosophers. Should you divert a train from five people strapped to the tracks to a side-track with only one person strapped to it? What if that one person were a renowned cancer researcher? What if there were only a 70% chance the five people would die?

These questions sound like they have nothing to do with a government budget. These annual events are, after all, conveyed as an endeavour in accounting. They are a chance to show anticipated tax revenues and propose public spending. We are told the name of the game is “fiscal responsibility” and…

Read complete article

~	Our tall, wet forests were not open and park-like when colonists arrived – and we shouldn’t be burning them

~	Politics with Michelle Grattan: Economist Chris Richardson on an ‘ugly’ inflation result and the coming budget

~	Presidential elections in Venezuela: Less free than ever

~	Nova Weetman lost her partner to cancer at the worst possible time. Her memoir blends hard-won wisdom with pure nostalgic joy

~	The stories of Australia’s Muslim Anzacs have long been forgotten. It’s time we honour them

~	Climate change and human rights: how a landmark legal victory in Europe could affect NZ

~	What kind of diner are you? 6 types of diners who avoid plant-based meat dishes

~	Counter-narratives from the colonial archive: Tony Birch on the writing of Kim Scott

~	Sexual assault victims give evidence in court, but alleged perpetrators don’t have to. Bruce Lehrmann’s defamation case shows why that needs to change

~	The story of the first Alor people adapting to climate change 43,000 years ago